Electrification and renewable fuels are important for the automotive industry to reach its climate neutrality goals. However, the automotive sector will need a holistic approach to decarbonization that includes the entire life cycle of the vehicle. In addition, manufacturers will need to identify and implement new technologies and processes to lower process emissions. OEMs will also need to collaborate with their supply chain and ecosystem partners to achieve these goals. This means understanding the technologies, materials and costs associated with these processes. OEMs will need to work with other OEMs and the ecosystem to identify areas of competitive advantage and to maximize the cost of decarbonization. This article has great post to read
on about automotive decarbonization.
The first step to automotive decarbonization is to reduce production emissions. Vehicle production emissions include emissions from the production of ICE and materials, including plastics, aluminum, and other materials. ICE contributes a minimal amount of production GHG impact, while materials produce the lion's share of production GHG impact. However, ICE emissions do not have a direct effect on emissions from the fuel supply. This is because most automotive materials have several viable decarbonization paths, and a policy that ignores all GHG sources will have difficulty minimizing the automotive sector's climate impact.
In this study, production GHG emissions were estimated using data from 11 modern ICEVs. Life cycle GHG emissions were compared over a total driving range of 180,000 km. The effect of a BEV's share in a fleet was also compared with various powertrains and fuels. The results were compared to the 95 g/km CO2 emissions limit. The result was a 66 percent abatement of emissions. This would have a net effect on vehicle costs. The study also looked at the effects of different electricity mixes on vehicle emissions, including renewable electricity and E85.
The study found that if a BEV's production emissions were reduced by just 29 percent, the total abatement would be cost-effective. This means that if the automotive industry were to reduce emissions from material production by just 29 percent, the total emissions abatement could be applied to an additional 37 percent of abatement measures. However, the amount of cost-effective savings from material reductions may be limited in the short term. Visit this website: https://derivevq.com/
to discover more about this service.
In addition, the study found that while BEVs have a small contribution to production phase GHG emissions, they have a relatively high impact on usage phase emissions. This was due to the increased energy consumption during the charging process, as well as the effect of the 95 g/km CO2 emissions limits. Interestingly, the production GHG impact of the BEV would be offset by a reduction in usage phase emissions. This indicates that the overall impact of a BEV on emissions would be comparable to that of an ICE vehicle.
The study also found that a combination of renewable fuels and electrification could reach its decarbonization goals. These include bio-CCUs, which allow the increased production of sustainable biofuels. These fuels can be obtained from residues and waste products, and can also be produced from hydrotreated vegetable oil. The study found that if the automotive industry were to adopt a combined approach, the total abatement could reach the required level of 66 percent.
This post will help you understand the topic even better: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-out_of_fossil_fuel_vehicles